Talk:Champion's Cloak: Difference between revisions
IceSoulMOG (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
:*Your HP identification is correct. At level 85 and S rank, 4080 HP should be the outcome. [[User:Rokujou|Rokujou]] ([[User talk:Rokujou|talk]]) 14:07, 21 April 2016 (UTC) | :*Your HP identification is correct. At level 85 and S rank, 4080 HP should be the outcome. [[User:Rokujou|Rokujou]] ([[User talk:Rokujou|talk]]) 14:07, 21 April 2016 (UTC) | ||
:*The original Accuracy in Row 2 is 2.25%. Accuracy : MP Gain when attacking = 2 : 1, so i think the base effect is around 1%~1.125% now. (need more test to find out the value) | :*The original Accuracy in Row 2 is 2.25%. Accuracy : MP Gain when attacking = 2 : 1, so i think the base effect is around 1%~1.125% now. (need more test to find out the value) | ||
:**and my apply before a few hours is wrong. If you don't have a rank, you will only get 20% of the status in | :**and my apply before a few hours is wrong. If you don't have a rank, you will only get 20% of the status in B rank. -[[User:IceSoulMOG|IceSoulMOG]] ([[User talk:IceSoulMOG|talk]]) 14:27, 21 April 2016 (UTC) | ||
:* Ah... 1.125% does clear it up. So MP Gain When Attack is also directly derived from Accuracy equations. I see~ Thanks for the clearance - [[User:Flandrean|Flandrean]] 16:44 22 April 2016 (JP) | |||
after identification revamp, Ive also been re-identifying this cloak. Overall there is still no variation of its numerical value. So I assume there is none | |||
<br>Finally Critical Identification is obtained.. TTuTT | |||
*Character Level 85, Rank S PvP, | |||
*Critical 407, Add dmg 244 | |||
According to the equation it is correct, thus I conclude it still follows the same rule as before. without % Variation I guess. - [[User:Flandrean|Flandrean]] 23:00 4th May 2016 (JST) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:03, 4 May 2016
Identification Value
Thank you IceSoulMOG for linking me to this page~
So... for 6% Critical Identification. I will need Star Rank in PvP before re-identifying my Cloak, I assume?
The 6% Critical Value can only be obtained from
- Combination of Row 1(2.5%) and Row 2(1.5%) Identification Value.
- Total 4% then with Star Rank multiplier of +50%
- 4+2 = 6% Value Achieved
I guess...?
What about if the rank got reset? Will its status change by itself? Or will it stay the same value as its last identification?
Thanks~
-Flandrean 17:33, 21st April 2016 (JP)
- Yes.
- It will change by itself. If you don't have a rank, you will get E rank's status.
-IceSoulMOG (talk) 09:34, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Wow you reply fast O.o
Then i have a bit of question with my own cloak
- Informations : Chara level 85, S Rank PvP, Row 2 Option is MP gain when attacking 180(numerical value as I view it)
- From my rank I can assume I have 20% bonus of its base status. 180/120 *100 = 150 numerical value status
- 150...? Level 85 1% value should be 136 I think..? O.o I expected its base status as 1.5% but the value is weird
What do you think of this?
Oh and btw the Row 1 is HP so a bit annoying to calculate.. It's value is 4080
Flandrean 20:12 21 April 2016 (JP)
- Your HP identification is correct. At level 85 and S rank, 4080 HP should be the outcome. Rokujou (talk) 14:07, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- The original Accuracy in Row 2 is 2.25%. Accuracy : MP Gain when attacking = 2 : 1, so i think the base effect is around 1%~1.125% now. (need more test to find out the value)
- and my apply before a few hours is wrong. If you don't have a rank, you will only get 20% of the status in B rank. -IceSoulMOG (talk) 14:27, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- Ah... 1.125% does clear it up. So MP Gain When Attack is also directly derived from Accuracy equations. I see~ Thanks for the clearance - Flandrean 16:44 22 April 2016 (JP)
after identification revamp, Ive also been re-identifying this cloak. Overall there is still no variation of its numerical value. So I assume there is none
Finally Critical Identification is obtained.. TTuTT
- Character Level 85, Rank S PvP,
- Critical 407, Add dmg 244
According to the equation it is correct, thus I conclude it still follows the same rule as before. without % Variation I guess. - Flandrean 23:00 4th May 2016 (JST)
